Hello Everyone,
The Men and Masculinities Knowledge Community has moved to a new site!
http://naspammkc.wordpress.com/
Please follow us there as we hope to continue to spark conversation about Masculinity...
The Men and Masculinties Knowledge Community
This KC was founded upon a pro-feminist, anti-racist, gay-affirmative agenda with the hope of providing resources to increase multi-cultural competence among male students by providing the NASPA membership with tools to invite and engage men into this process. The underlying assumption is that men in general are interested in social justice, capable of enacting it, and that they need language and a connection to the process.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Monday, April 9, 2012
Hug Hegemony
Give me a handshake or give me a hug. I’ll be honest – I used to despise what I like to call the “hugshake.” To give you a visual, the hugshake occurs when two people shake hands while using the other arm to hug each other. Hugshakes are the manifestation of masculine hug hegemony. If you want to give me a hug, just give me the hug! Don’t beat around the bush. Let your inhibition go and forget what the other guys around us are thinking. They’re probably far too jealous to express the fact that they want a nice bear hug just as much as the guys next to them. Hugs are good for the soul, and men shouldn’t deny themselves the opportunity for improved holistic health.
I grew up with friends and family that would only give hugs, so my
perplexity is certainly merited. But does this mean that I shouldn’t be
sensitive to those that fear dissolving the mask of masculinity? For
those that may feel the way I do, I have some terrible news. I am an
absolute hypocrite. I did what I thought to be the unthinkable…
A few weekends ago, I celebrated my birthday at a bar in downtown
Chicago with a few good friends of mine. One of them taps me on the
shoulder and says, “Warren, do you know who that is behind you? That’s Reggie
Bush!” I likely wouldn’t have known the Miami Dolphins running back had he not
at one time dated Kim Kardashian, so to anyone that doesn’t follow sports,
there’s your description. For some reason, I felt it was
appropriate to pass by his bodyguard to introduce myself. “Hi
Reggie, it’s my birthday. Would you mind taking a picture with me?” I
hand my camera to his bodyguard and he snaps the photo. I thank him by
shaking his hand…then the unthinkable happened. He reached in and gave me
the dreaded hugshake. I was too nervous and star struck to do anything
but to revert back to my masculine script and graciously accept his gesture.
You may be thinking I just invalidated all my
previous statements. However, by reflecting on this experience, I
have developed a more humbled perspective. Men will use societal
masculine norms for many reasons, one being a form of protection. Reggie
made me realize that we need to meet other men where they are at, because some are
simply not ready to dissolve their mask and move away from a world of
subconsciously accepted normative behavior. However, this does not mean
that I won’t provide the challenge to step away from these invisible
boundaries. I will be a loyal partner, waiting patiently until the other
is ready to embark on the path toward true self-expression. I will
provide support in a manner in which he sees fit, and I encourage others to do
the same.
Warren Grove works with the Center for the Study of Masculinities & Men's Development (CMMD) at Western Illinois University. He can reached at
ww-grove@wiu.edu. For more information about the CMMD, please visit their webpage here.
ww-grove@wiu.edu. For more information about the CMMD, please visit their webpage here.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
MMKC Pre-Conference: Beneath The Surface
I have enjoyed working with the MMKC over the past two
years. There has been a surplus of
conversation regarding the complexity of men and the multiple modes of
masculinity that exists. The research has been phenomenal, the practitioner
perspective is invaluable, and the unified efforts of all who are invested in
the success of men in higher education are commendable. Although I appreciate the
scholarship and academic work that has come out of our knowledge community, I
have been much more intrigued by the internal transparency and learning that
happens beneath the surface of the MMKC. In a field where pedigree,
credentials, and reputation carry a significant amount of weight, it is difficult
to find men and women who are willing to expose themselves to a group – be it fear
of judgment or arrogance. As I reflect on the MMKC preconference at NASPA, I am
overwhelmed by the synergy, genius, and trust that were in the room –
participants and presenters alike. I’m sure we all anticipated walking away
with programs and research to take back to our campuses. But as the day went on
I got the sense that everyone learned more about themselves through discussing
the challenges and triumphs of working with college aged men.
Each person spoke candidly about their upbringing (good and
bad), fears, accomplishments, doubts, triumphs, and aspirations with a nakedness
that is often reserved for intimate settings around people we have known for
many years. I was pleasantly surprised that we willingly offered our personal
experiences as a sacrifice to foster the conversation about self-exploration
and identity development not just our students but for ourselves as well. Often times we tell men on our campuses to embrace
difficult and uncomfortable conversations that will help them grow but we won’t
engage these conversations with our own peers and colleagues. We tell them to
confront injustice in their social settings but we will sit idly by and let our
silence become consent. We tell them to grapple with the intersection of
spirituality, power and privilege, sexuality, ethnicity, socio-economic status
but we fail to contend with it ourselves. I have consistently observed
colleagues that send these messages but refuse to do the self-work that is
required.
The preconference was an awesome experience because we
modeled what we want men on campus to do. We all did the work it takes to help
the community achieve greater enlightenment. I estimate that the one day session
that was meant to be purely academic ended up being a therapeutic and
transformative experience that will shape our personal and professional lives
for many years to come. Personally, the MMKC preconference was the highlight of
NASPA – no disrespect to John Legend and his outstanding opening performance.
But to his point our discussion reaffirmed the notion that we are all just
ordinary people men and women trying to be the best human beings we can be.
Rafael Moffett, Ed. D is the Director for Campus & Community Involvement (CCI) at Trinity University and the Region III Representative for the Men & Masculinities Knowledge Community (MMKC.) He can be reached at raphael.moffett@trinity.edu.
Friday, March 2, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Monday, February 6, 2012
Struggling Together...
Raphael Moffett is one of our outstanding MMKC Region
Representatives. He represents Region III, if my memory serves well. As we’ve
been preparing for our pre-conference at the national conference in Phoenix,
he’s been sharing with me about his concept of ‘struggling together’ with our
students. He is referencing the need to balance the request that our students
examine their own lives through a gendered lens (a task that is often met with
a sense of struggle on various levels) with our need as educators and
facilitators to do the same – with them. He posits that we are to not only walk
beside them, but share our lives with them. As my mind was recently playing
with this concept, I thought about the fact that as educators, we often
struggle together in a number of ways. Or, perhaps, we should be sharing
our struggles with each other more often.
I can remember mentoring young men in the past and grappling
with how I should be guiding them and speaking into their dating lives. I
wasn’t sure if it was appropriate to tell them stories from my past and how I
failed – how would they see me then? In the end, I found it freeing to give
them a chance to learn from my mistakes. They also seemed to respect me because
of my honesty. Likewise, when counseling a supervisee about some of his worries
and performance issues, we both seemed to relax when I allowed myself to ‘go
there’ and let him know about my shortcomings in the past, and the ways that I
am currently unsure of how my supervisor views the work that I produce. I also
have a dear friend at a former institution who has continually pressed me to
understand my many privileges. I cherish the times we have together, mostly on
the phone any more, when she can give me a different perspective on life. This
only happens because I’ve allowed her in that ‘space’ and she has committed a
part of her life to my educating me about the realities of those with less
privilege.
I find colleagues struggling to fight ignorance, politics,
and apathy on campuses regarding issues of masculinity, feminism, and
inclusion. I find colleagues struggling to balance their ‘day jobs’ with their
gender work. I find colleagues struggling to find the words to speak truth into
the lives of students. I find colleagues struggling against the workings of a
strict code that follows the gender binary. I find colleagues struggling to
find the time to explore the literature that will help to educate them about
topics that are germane to their constituencies and stakeholders. I find
colleagues struggling to advocate for professional development funds so that
they may more fully engage in national conversations of import. I find
colleagues struggling to have the awareness and find the energy needed to
reflect on themselves as gendered beings and grow in their understanding of the
impact of having grown up in a society that places such varied emphases on
gender.
As I previously mentioned, let’s struggle together. Call
your Regional Representative. Call a friend on campus. Make a new friend in
your multicultural center, your women’s studies faculty, or in your student
body. Commit to reading one article this year and then host a brown bag lunch
to discuss the contents therein.
We cannot do this on our own.
Personally, I feel blessed to have such a strong network of
colleagues, friends, and mentors throughout the country who I can count on to
listen as I vent, share as I inquire, and call me out when I’m oppressing a
person or group. We all do it, no need to hide it. Growth occurs when we can
critically analyze such concepts against a number of different events and
philosophies. To do so is to struggle. To struggle is to be frustrated, and in
the words of one of my mentors, frustration breeds change, and change breeds
growth.
And who can argue with growth?
Patrick Tanner is the Director of Student and Enrollment Services at Pennsylvania State University - York and serves as the MMKC Region II Representative. He can be reached at ptanner@psu.edu.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




